NEW POLL: Informed voters don’t want weed in Schedule III
When voters hear about the risks rescheduling brings, they get why it would be a terrible idea to put weed in Schedule III.
When voters hear about the risks rescheduling brings, they get why it would be a terrible idea to put weed in Schedule III.
The debate over rescheduling marijuana has brought one of the most underreported dangers of America’s weed trade into sharp focus: its penetration by Chinese criminal networks illegally growing marijuana throughout the country.
Greg Steube’s case for rescheduling is case is riddled with omissions, distortions, and flawed logic that ignore the scientific, legal, and public-health realities justifying marijuana’s current classification.
The DPA demands demands descheduling while ignoring the explosion of high-THC products and the industry’s exploitation of social justice rhetoric.
Rob Corry fought for wider access to weed in Colorado. Now he’s taking a stand against efforts to further normalize the drug.
Fighting Big Weed in the courts not only protects public health. It puts the harms of the drug and the way the inudstry flouts the law in the spotlight.
Trulieve has big, big money riding on the campaign to get the drug into Schedule III.
Rescheduling marijuana would make it possible for addiction profiteers to deduct normal business expenses at tax time and power up violent criminal gangs in doing so.
There’s no upside of rescheduling for anyone except the fat cats of Big Weed.
On what people think the rescheduling push is about, what it’s really about, and how it should be stopped in its tracks.